Antimicrobial activity of Abelmoschus moschatus leaf extracts

Priti Maheshwari1 and Anil Kumar *

1School of Biotechnology, Devi AhilyaUniversity, Khandwa Road,Indore – 452001,India.

1 Present address: Department of Biological Sciences, University of Lethbridge, AlbertaCanada.

*For correspondence - ak_sbt@yahoo.com

Current Trends in Biotechnology and Pharmacy , Volume 3 (3) July - 2009

Abstract

Hexane, ethyl acetate, methanol and aqueous extracts prepared from the leaves of Abelmoschus moschatus were evaluated for their antimicrobial activity against a number of pathogens by using disc diffusion assay method. Clear zones of inhibition were reported for Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus megaterium, Shigella flexneri, Proteus mirabilis, Proteus vulgaris and Cornebacterium diphtheriae. After performing a bioassay guided fractionation of the eight hexane fractions, it was revealed that the fraction exhibiting major antibacterial activity against C. diphtheriae contained terpenoid oil.

Key words:  Antibiotic, bioactivity guided fractionation, crude extracts, disc diffusion assay.

Introduction

It is well known that infectious diseases are responsible for a high proportion of health problems, especially in developing countries. Microorganisms have developed resistance to many antibiotics due to their frequent use. The situation has created immense clinical problems for infectious disease treatment. More scientists are in search for new antimicrobial substances derived from plants. Historically, plants provide us with a good source of anti-infective agents. Emetine, quinine, berberine etc. remain highly effective drugs in the fight against microbial infections (1). In the traditional systems of medicine, plants are used in the form of crude extracts, infusions and powders to treat common infections without scientific evidence of efficacy (2). Therefore it is of great interest to screen these plants to validate their use in traditional medicine and to reveal active principles through isolation and characterization. Once their therapeutic action(s) is/are established, they may serve as an important source for designing new and more effective drugs for chemotherapy.

In the present study the antimicrobial properties of A. moschatus have been evaluated.  A. moschatus is a known medicinal plant used for the cure of bacterial diseases in the Indian traditional system of medicine (3-4). The plant is used for the treatment of gonorrhea, leucoderma, diabetes, cramps, poor circulation, and aching joints (5). The microbes used in the present study for evaluation of antimicrobial activity of A. moschatus were S. aureus (causative agent of hospital acquired surgical wound infections), B. megaterium (causative agent of diseases like meningitis, endocarditis, conjunctivitis and acute gastroenteritis), S. flexneri (common pathogen for diarrhea), Proteus species (urinary tract and wound infections), C. diphtheria etc. The seeds of the plant are known for musk like essential oil. However, these are used as antiseptic, antispasmodic, opthalmic, diuretic, deodorant, and to sweeten the breath (6-7). Major reports of isolation and identification of secondary metabolites come from the  seeds of A. moschatus thatinclude: ambrettolic acid, b-sitosterol, b-sitosterol-b-D-glycoside, farnesol, and furfural (8). A brief overview of the traditional medicinal use of A. moschatus indicates its effectiveness in the treatment of various bacteriological and fungal pathogenesis. In vitro activity of extracts prepared from the leaves were evaluated against a number of pathogenic microorganisms to validate and provide a scientific basis to support these claims.

Materials and methods

Plant material

A. moschatus was grown in the Green House of theSchool of Biotechnology, Devi AhilyaUniversity, Indore. The plants were used for their supply of the leaves.

Bacterial strains

The test microorganisms included a number of clinical isolates listed in Table 1 procured from ChoithramHospital and Research centre, Indore.

Preparation of crude extracts

Leaves of A. moschatus were washed thoroughly under tap water and shade dried at room temperature (25-30 ° C) until a constant weight was obtained. The dried leaves were pulverized with a mechanical grinder. Seventy grams of pulverized powder was defatted by soaking in 100 ml of hexane. The soaking sample was kept for 48 h on a rotary shaker at room temperature. Hexane was decanted every 48 h and fresh hexane was added. This was repeated until the sample was colorless. The hexane extracts were pooled and concentrated under vacuum until dry product was collected. The residue of the leaf powder left after hexane extraction was further extracted with solvents of increasing polarity such as ethyl acetate, methanol and water. The ethyl acetate, methanol, and aqueous extracts obtained were concentrated under vacuum and stored at 4 ° C. The percent yield of each extract was calculated (9) .

Disc diffusion assay for microbial sensitivity testing

Agar disc diffusion assay for screening the anti-bacterial potential of hexane, ethyl acetate, methanol, and aqueous extracts of A. moschatus leaf powder was carried out as described by Murray et al. (10). The dried extracts were dissolved in their respective solvents to a final concentration of 0.1, 1 and 2 % and sterilized by filtration through a 0.45 mm membrane syringe filter. The sterile discs (6 mm in diameter) were soaked in their respective extracts for complete saturation. Afterwards, discs were completely dried  to ensure complete evaporation of the solvent. The discs were stored under aseptic conditions. A 5ml of each bacterial strain was inoculated in 5 ml of Mueller Hinton broth (Meat infusion 2.0 g/l; casein hydrolyzate 17.5 g/l; starch 1.5 g/l ) in a test tube and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Thereafter, Mueller Hinton Agar No. 2 (Mueller Hinton broth with agar-agar 13.0 g/l) was prepared and poured in sterile petri plates. The test strain 200 ml (inoculum size 108 cells/ml) was evenly spread on agar petri plates with a sterile glass spreader. Sterile discs impregnated with the respective extracts were transferred aseptically to the agar plates containing the inoculum. Seven discs were placed per plate. Each test was repeated three times with a positive control (antibiotic respective for each microorganism) and a negative control (solvent disc). After incubation at 37°C for 24 h, the plates were examined for development of zones of inhibition. Microbial growth was determined by measuring the diameter of zone of inhibition in millimeter by the antibiotic zone scale.

Bioactivity guided fractionation of active crude extracts

Based on the results of bioassay and Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) profile, the hexane extract of A. Moschatus leaf powder was further fractionated by silica gel adsorption column chromatography. Silica gel is a 3–D polymer of tetrahedron groups of silicon oxide (SiO2.H2O) consisting of exposed silanol groups that act as active centers for formation of H–bonds with compounds being chromatographed. A t hick wall glass column size 45 x 4.5 cm was packed with a suspension of silica gel (mesh size 60 -120; Merck) in hexane with a bed height of 20 –30 cm and 40-60 cm head space. A 100 g of silica / g of the crude extract was used for column packing. After equilibration, crude active hexane fraction was absorbed on minimum amount of silica and loaded on top of the column. Solvents of increasing polarity (mixture of hexane – ethyl acetate) were passed through the column for elution of the sample. A linear flow rate of 2 ml/min was maintained and fractions of 30 ml were collected. The 30 ml fraction samples were then subjected to TLC. The identical fractions were pooled and concentrated to dryness under vacuum. The different fractions obtained through fractionation of A. moschatus hexane extract were subjected to disc diffusion assay for identification of bioactive fractions.

Results and Discussion

The percent yield of hexane, ethyl acetate, methanol and aqueous extracts of A. moschatus were found to be 4.4 %, 4.2 %, 14 % and 32.66 % respectively. TLC profile of the crude extracts indicated positive tests with Liebermann-Burchard reagent (LB reagent), Noller’s reagent and tetranitromethane revealing presence of terpenoids. The samples were also positive for alkaloids and saponins as tested by standard phytochemical methods (11). These compounds have been isolated from numerous plants and are known to exhibit a broad spectrum of anti-microbial activities (12-15).

The results of the antimicrobial activities of the hexane, ethyl acetate, methanol and aqueous extracts of A. moschatus leaf powder extracts by the disc diffusion assay method indicated that they were active against a number of tested pathogenic microorganisms (Table 2). There was significant antimicrobial activity of the hexane extract against C. diphtheriae, the causative agent of diphtheria. A 2 % concentration of the hexane extract showed a zone of inhibition of the size 19 mm. Hexane extract also inhibited the growth of Proteus species (P. mirabilis and P. vulgaris) and Shigella flexneri.   The P. mirabilis has the ability to produce high levels of urease making the urine more alkaline. If left untreated, the increased alkalinity can lead to the formation of crystals of struvite, and calcium carbonate. P. vulgaris is known to cause urinary tract and wound infections. S. flexneri is common pathogen for diarrhea. The ethyl acetate extract at a concentration of 2 % exhibited activity only against B. megaterium. This bacterium has ability to form tough, protective endospore allowing the organism to tolerate extreme environmental conditions. It is the causative agent of diseases like meningitis, endocarditis, conjunctivitis and acute gastroenteritis in immuno-compromised patients.    

Methanol extract exhibited significant activity against a number of bacteria tested, probably due to the presence of high amounts of flavonoids and alkaloids that are also known to possess antibacterial activity (16). A 1 % concentration of methanol extract inhibited growth of S. aureus, P. vulgaris and C. diphtheria (Figure 1). The S. aureus is a major cause of hospital acquired surgical wound infections. It is a leading cause of various ailments such as soft tissue infections, pneumonia, meningitis, boils, arthritis, osteomyelitis (chronic bone infection), toxic shock syndrome (TSS) and scalded skin syndrome. Besides, it rapidly develops resistance to many antimicrobial agents (17) . Both hexane and ethyl acetate extracts exhibited equal amount of activity against P. vulgaris (zone of inhibition 16 mm). Aqueous extract of A. moschatus did not exhibit activity against any of the tested microorganisms. Neither of the extracts was active against Candida albicans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Salmonella typhii. Themicroorganisms were least sensitive to the aqueous crude extracts due to negligible secondary metabolites in it.

Column chromatography of the bioactive hexane fraction of A. moschatus yielded 8 different fractions. Results of the bioassays of these fractions concluded that major activity was present in fractions 2-7 eluted by hexane containing 10-70 % ethyl acetate (Table 3). Negligible activity was demonstrated by fractions 1 and 8. The fraction 5 was found responsible for major inhibition of the growth of C. diphtheriae. The fractions 2 to 7 exhibited activity against Proteus species. The Fraction 7 exhibited strongest activity against P. mirabilis (zone of inhibition 28 mm) whereas all other fractions were equally effective against P. vulgaris. The results are very promising since Proteus species are responsible for 29% of all human urinary tract infections and hospital acquired wound infections. The S. flexneri< active fractions were 3, 5 and 6. Shiga toxinproduced by Shigella species is the cause of shigellosis (Bacillary dysentery). However, nearly 3% people with acertain genetic predisposition, namely HLA-B27 infected with S. flexnerisubsequently develop Reiter's syndrome (pains in their joints, irritation of the eyes, and painful urination) which can last for years and can lead to chronic arthritis which is difficult to treat. The present findings may be exploited for a new drug against Shigella species.

The active column fractions resolved into a series of spots when TLC plates were observed under UV light and after spray detection. The fractions 1 to 5 were thick non volatile oils and developed blue green colored spots on spraying with LB reagent indicating presence of terpenoids. Noller’s reagent also showed positive reaction with these fractions developing a range of colors from red, magenta to purple further confirming that all these oils are mixtures of terpenes mainly sesquiterpenes (18). Terpenes (oils) from various plants such as Mentha piperita , Mentha spicata , Thymus vulgaris , Origanum vulgare,Origanum applii,Aloysia triphylla , Ocimum gratissimum,Ocimum basilicum are shown to exhibit considerable inhibitory effects against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, S. aureus and many other pathogens (19-23). Efforts are in progress for complete characterization of the oils.

Increasing number of plants are been screened for their anti-microbial activity day by day. According to World Health Organization (WHO) more than 80% of the world's population relies on traditional medicine for their primary healthcare needs.  A. moschatus shows anti-microbial activity against a wide variety of pathogens not a common characteristic as usually a single plant species does not show activity against not so many microbes tested (24-25).

Conclusion

The present study revealed the role of essential oil from leaf extracts of A. moschatus as a strong anti-bacterial agent against Proteus sp and C. diphtheriae under the laboratory conditions. It may be considered as a fruitful approach towards the search of new drugs. The overall results of the antimicrobial activity of the leaf extracts of A. moschatus justified the traditional uses of the plant and suggested that the indigenous traditional medicines could be used as a guide in the continuing search of new natural products with potential medicinal properties.

Acknowledgements

Senior Research Fellowship of Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi to Priti Maheshwari is gratefully acknowledged. The authors acknowledge the facilities of the Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of India, New Delhi (DBT) under M.Sc. Biotechnology program. Facilities of DBT’s, BioinformaticsSub-center used in the preparation of the manuscript are also acknowledged. 

Rererences

1.Cowan, M.M. (1999). Plant products as antimicrobial agents. Clinic. Microbiol. Rev ., 12: 564 -582.

2.Recio, M.C. (1989). 1978-1988 - A review of some antimicrobial compounds isolated from medicinal plants reported in the literature. Phytother. Res., 3: 117 -125

3.Verma, D.M., Balakrishnan, R.R., and Dixit, R.D. (1993). Flora of Madhya Pradesh. Botanical Survey ofIndia, Lucknow,India.

4.Sala, A.V. (1995). Indian medicinal plants, a compendium of 500 species. Orient Longman, Madras.

5. Bown, D. (1984). Encyclopedia of Herbs and their Uses. Dorling Kindersley, London. ISBN 0-7513-020-31.

6. Grieve, S. (1984). A Modern Herbal. Penguin  ISBN 0-14-046-440-9.

7.Agharkar, S.P. (1991). Medicinal plants of Bombay presidency. Scientific Publisher Jodhpur,India..

8.Misra, G., Sharma, V.N., Mitra, C.R., and Kaul, K.N., (1962). Aromatic principles from Abelmoschus moschatus (Hibiscus abelmoschus) seeds. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research. Patent number IN  72408, date 19620707  application: IN  19600628.

9.Hernández, M. M., Heraso, C., Villarreal, M. L., Vargas-Arispuro, L. and  Aranda , E. (1999). Biological activities of crude plant extracts from Vitex trifolia L. (Verbenaceae). Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 67: 37-44.

 10. Murray, P.R., Baron, E.J., Pfaller, M.A., Tenover, F.C., and Yolke, R.H. (1999). Manual of clinical microbiology. 7th ed.Washington: ASM. 1527 -1539.

11.Harborne, J.B. (1973). Phytochemical methods. London, Chapman and Hall.

12. Ulubelen, A., Topcu, G., Eris, C., Soenmez, U., Kartal, M., Kurucu, S., and Bozok-Johansson, C. (1994). Terpenoids from Salvia sclarea. Phytochemistry, 36:971-974.

13. Singh, B., and Singh, S. (2003). Antimicrobial activity of terpenoids from Trichodesma amplexicaule Roth.Phytother Res,17: 814-816.

14.Weigenand, O., Hussain, A.A., Lall, N., and Meyer, J.J.M. (2004). Antimicrobial activity of naphthoquinones and triterpenoids from Euclea natalensis root bark. J. Nat. Prod., 67: 1936 -1938.

15.Wannissorn, B., Jarikasem, S., Siriwangchai, T., and Thubthimthed, S. (2005). Antibacterial properties of essential oils from Thai medicinal; plants. Fitoterapia, 76: 233-236.

16.Sokomba, E., Wambebe, C., Chowdhury, B.K., Irija-Ogeide, O.N., and Orkor, D. (1986). Preliminary phytochemical, pharmacological and antibacterial studies of alkaloidal extracts of leaves of Synclisia scabrida Meirs. J. Ethnopharmacol., 18: 173 -185.

17.Nitta, T., Arai, T., Takamastu, H., Inatomi, Y., Murata, H., Iinuma, M., Tanaka, T., Ito, T., Asai, F., Ibrahim,I., Nakanishi, T., and Watabe, K. (2002). Antibacterial activity of extracts from tropical and subtropical plants on methicillin resistant S. aureus. Journal of Health Science, 48: 273 – 276.

18.Misra, T.N., Singh, R.S., Upadhyay, J., and Srivastava, R. (1984). Chemical constituents of Vernonia cinerea, Part I. Isolation and spectral studies of triterpenes. J. Nat. Prod., 47: 368-372.

19.Nakamura, C.V., Ueda-Nakamura, T., Bnado, E., Melo, A.F.N., Cortez, D.A.G., and Dias, Filho, B.P. (1999). Antibacterial activity of O. gratissimum L. essential oil. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo. Cruz., 94: 675-678. 

20. Dorman, H.J.D., and Deans, S.G. (2000). Anti-microbial agents from plants: antibacterial activity of plant volatile oils. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 88: 308-316.

21.Faleiro, L., Miguel, G.M., Guerrero, C.A.C., and Brito, J.M.C. (1999). Antimicrobial activity of essential oils of Rosmarinus officinalis L., Thymus mastichina (l) L. Ssp mastichina and Thymus albicans. Hofmanns & link.ISHS Acta Horticulturae, 501:II WOCMAP Congress Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, Part 2: Pharmacognosy, Pharmacology, Phytomedicine, Toxicology .

22. Stefanini, M.B., Figueiredo, R.O., Ming, L.C., and Júnior, A.F. (2003). Antimicrobial activity of the essential oils of some spice herbs. ISHS Acta Horticulturae, 597:International Conference on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants (Part II) .

23. Bhattacharjee,I., Ghosh, A., and Chandra, G. (2005). Antimicrobial activity of the essential oil of Cestrum diurnum (L.) (Solanales: Solanaceae). African Journal of Biotechnology, 4: 371-374.

24.Duraipandiyan, V., Ayyanar, M., and Ignacimuthu, S. (2006). Antimicrobial activity of some ethnomedicinal plants used by Paliyar tribe from Tamil Nadu,India. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 6:35.

25.Gislene, G. F.N., Julian, L., Paulo, C.F., and Giuliana, L.S.(2000). Antimicrobial activity of plant extracts and phytochemicals on antibioticresistant bacteria. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 31:247-256.

Table 1. List of test pathogens along with the (+) ve controls used in the disc diffusion assay

Microorganism

Zone (in mm)

Amount ( m g/disc)

(+)ve control (antibiotic)

Escherishia coli

17

10

Ampicillin

Escherishia coli

18

10

Ampicillin

Bacillus megaterium

17

50

Chloramphenicol

Bacillus subtilis

18

50

Chloramphenicol

Proteus mirabilis

16

50

Chloramphenicol

Proteus vulgaris

19

15

Erylhromycin

Klebsiella pneumoniae

26

50

Chloramphenicol

Cornebacterium diphtheriae

24

50

Chloramphenicol

Candida albicans

24

50

Chloramphenicol

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

28

50

Chloramphenicol

Shigella flexneri

13

50

Chloramphenicol

Salmonella typhii

17

50

Chloramphenicol

Table 2. Anti-Bacterial disc diffusion assay of A. moschatus leaf extracts

Organisms

Hexane Extract (%)

Ethyl acetate extract (%)

Methanol extract (%)

Aqueous extract (%)

0.1

1

2

0.1

1

2

0.1

1

2

0.1

1

2

E. coli

-

T

-

-

T

T

-

-

-

-

-

T

S. aureus

-

T

T

-

T

-

-

10±0.2

10±0.2

-

-

-

B. megaterium

-

-

-

-

T

12± 0.5

-

-

-

-

-

-

B. subtilis

-

T

T

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

P. mirabilis

T

T

14±0.2

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

P. vulgaris

T

10±0.2

16±0.2

T

T

T

T

16±0.2

16±0.2

-

-

T

K. pneumoneae

-

-

-

-

-

-

T

T

T

T

T

T

C. dipthereae

-

-

19± 0.2

-

-

T

-

15±0.2

15±0.4

-

-

-

C. albicans

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

P. aeruginosa

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

S. flexneri

-

-

16±0.2

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

S. typhi

-

-

-

-

-

 

-

-

-

-

T

T

All the zones are in ‘mm’ and each value represents an average of three replications. T- Activity in traces (zone of inhibition < 10 mm); ± is the standard error.

Table 3. Anti-Bacterial disc diffusion assay of A. moschatus hexane extract and column fractions

Organism

Crude Hexane extract (%)

Hexane column Fractions (1%)

0.1

1

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

P. mirabilis

T

T

14±0.2

T

12±0.2

16±0.2

12±0.4

18±0.5

14±0.4

28±0.2

T

P. vulgaris

T

10±0.2

16±0.2

T

10±0.4

12±0.2

12±0.2

12±0.4

10±0.2

12±0.2

T

C. diphtheriae

-

-

19± 0.2

-

-

-

21±0.2

-

-

-

-

S. flexneri

-

-

16±0.2

-

T

16±0.2

T

12±0.4

12±0.4

-

T

All the zones are in ‘mm’ and each value represents an average of three replications. T- Activity in traces (zone of inhibition< 10 mm); ± is the standard error.

Zone of inhibition obtained in anti-bacterial disc diffusion assay of A

Figure 1: Zone of inhibition obtained in anti-bacterial disc diffusion assay of A. moschatus extracts. A – Methanol extract against P. vulgaris. B -  Methanol extract against S. aureus.