I’m sure many of us are familiar with the use of neem branches as toothbrushes.
Cases of biopiracy in India – Turmeric patent controversy
The turmeric patent had been granted in March 1995 to two non-resident Indians associated with the University of Mississippi Medical Centre, Jackson, USA for “"Use of Turmeric in Wound Healing."
Turmeric is scientifically Curcuma longa.
It was revoked on the grounds of lacking the novelty requirement.
Revocation of so many patents makes you wonder if the US Patent Office always had its head in the clouds and always needed a giant flash of lightning to make it come out of them.
Its no surprise that this patent came to be revoked – what’s surprising is that it was even accepted.
Let us list the many uses of turmeric shall we?
• When applied to an open wounds, functions a painless antiseptic – there you go, their patent goes down the drain
• Used as kumkum in all Hindu temples and as a sign of matrimony
• We use it in so many foods – rarely is Benarasi or South Indian dish seen without it. Why? Simply because it is a wonderful digestive.
• Many women across the country use it a natural epilator
• Treatment of diarrhoea, arthritis and many skin diseases
• Some of the newly discovered facts about it:
o As an astounding anti-cancer agent.
o COX-2 inhibitor drugs have been known to block an enzyme called cyclooxygenase-2 which aggravates arthritis. Turmeric contains curcumin which inhibits this enzyme.
Why do such incidences keep happening?
Section 102 of the US Patent Act does not provide a general definition of 'prior art', but a very narrow rule-bound method to be used by low-level patent examiners for determining which materials will defeat a patent application by violation of the novelty and non-obviousness criteria.
Prior foreign activity anticipates a US patent only when the foreign activity is in a tangible, accessible form such as a published document or a patent. However, prior foreign knowledge, use and invention are all excluded when the question of prior art is considered in relation to a US patent application.
What a glaring loophole?
US’s reply to India’s constant patent problems:
'India has not yet made available product patent protection for pharmaceuticals and agricultural chemicals, and thus has chosen to take advantage of at least part of the exclusive marketing rights. Thus, India has violated its obligations under Article 70, paragraphs 8 and 9, of the TRIPs Agreement to (1) establish a mailbox system in its law, and ensure that no applicants are denied eligibility for patent protection because of the delay in establishing the mailbox system, and (2) establish a system for the grant of exclusive marketing rights.'
Isn’t it surprising how such a simple issue has become a matter of national pride?
There is a very valuable lesson to be learnt here: it’s the simplest thing in the world to find a loophole in something if you really want to but the most difficult thing in the world to be able to hold your head up when you’re discovered.
There’s nothing as peaceful as a clear conscience is there?
Patent is an exclusive right granted to inventor or discoverer to make, sell or use his invention or discovery for a specified period of time. It is also available for significant improvements on previously invented articles. Its characteristic lies in the power of excluding others even if the patentee does not desire to use the patent himself. The owner of a patent has the right to exclude others from making, using, offering for sale or selling his or her invention for a period of 20 years from the filing of the patent application.
The Indian Patent Act 1970 resembles British Patents Act 1949. The patent act of 1970 in its original form have distinction between product patents and process patents, the exception given in section 5 of the act of 1970 offered only a process patent for food, medicine or drug substances and specifically excluded product patents for the same.
Signing of Trade Related Intellectual Property Subjects (TRIPS) is considered to be a milestone towards development of intellectual property rights.
I am sharing this presenatiton on "Patent System In India" by K.S.Kardam ,Assistant Controller of Patents & Designs,Patent Office ,New Delhi for all the viewers to get the knowledge of patent practice in india.
Click to see next slide
Intelectual Property Rights : Product patents vs process patents
Patent applications are NOT the same as granted patents.
WHERE TO FILE A PATENT A patent is granted by national patent office or by a regional office (EPC)