Regulatory Articles

Anticipating New Regulatory Hurdles

The potential of the biotechnology industry to provide blockbuster products is clearly demonstrated by examples like Enbrel (for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in adults and of active polyarticular-course juvenile chronic arthritis), Remicade (for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn's disease), and MabThera (for treatment of stage III-IV follicular lymphoma and CD20 positive diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma).

View Full Article

Author(s): 
Emmanuelle M. Voisin.
Journal: 
Applied Clinical Trials, May 1, 2004.

Dissolution testing: An overview and a summary of recent trends and regulatory a

Dissolution testing is critical to measuring the performance of pharmaceutical products in tablet and capsule form. It is a relatively new analytical technique, and equipment modifications and improvements span the decade. This article gives an overview of the apparatuses and procedures used in dissolution testing. It also summarizes the activities of the major organizations and groups that influence dissolution testing standards.

For full-text article
Click Here

Author(s): 
Vivian A. Gray, V. A. Gray .
Journal: 
Consulting, Inc.Tablets& Capsules, October 2003

Part 11 Is Not Going Away: The New Electronic Records Draft Guidance

The rules for electronic records and signatures still remain in effect. The change means that companies must now justify their decisions o­n whether or not to implement specific electronic controls with documented risk assessments and considerations of the record requirements detailed in the corresponding predicate rule.

View Full Article

Author(s): 
Wolfgang Winter, Agilent Technologies GmbH and Ludwig Huber, Agilent Technologies GmbH .
Journal: 
BioPharm International, May 2003.

Achieving Regulatory Success in Phases IIIb and IV

Well-planned studies designed to pinpoint additional data are increasingly important as a result of the EU's emphasis o­n added therapeutic value.

For full article Click Here

Author(s): 
Alain Bouckenooghe.
Journal: 
Applied Clinical Trials, Aug 1, 2004.

Manufacture of Sterile Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients, guidance, 1999

Active Pharmaceuticals Ingredients Committee of CEFIC.

McClellan Moves to Block Counterfeits and Require Bar Codes Bef

FDA backs e-chips over paper pedigrees and unit-of-use packaging.

For full article Click Here

Author(s): 
Jill Wechsler.
Journal: 
BioPharm International, April 2004.

Pediatric Trials: The Impact of U.S. Legislative and Regulatory Efforts

It is not intuitive that scientists, clinicians, and parents would allow the most complex, constantly evolving human beings—the pediatric population—to be treated with unstudied medicines and therapies, while demanding a high level of evidence for therapies for the adult population. Unfortunately, this happened during the recent decades of rapid scientific and therapeutic discoveries. Why would it be acceptable that a population that is growing, developing, and inherently highly variable would not be studied while the more stable, not growing, and less variable adult population would be?

Author(s): 
Dianne Murphy.
Journal: 
Applied Clinical Trials, Jan 1, 2005.

Taming the Regulatory Beast: Regulation vs. Functionalism

Mass spectrometrists working in pharmaceuticals development tend to approach the issue of regulatory compliance with some trepidation. We know we can’t escape its considerable demands for our time and attention, and we’re willing to act accordingly to ensure that our instruments and procedures comply. Yet it often appears that requirements are expanding in both scope and detail. This month’s coauthor succinctly sums up the issue: “The FDA wants to see quality built into the product at the beginning of the development cycle because quality cannot be ascertained at the end.

View Full Article

Author(s): 
Michael P. Balogh , Virginia L. Corbin .
Journal: 
LCGC North America, Sep 1, 2004 .

Regulatory Affairs

When a firm embarks upon a contract manufacturing relationship with a third party, the questions that inevitably arise are: “Who is ultimately responsible for compliance? And what happens if and when a non-compliant situation arises?” The worst thing that can happen is to confront this question after a non-compliant situation occurs. A firm needs to know, from the beginning, who is responsible for each regulatory component.

For full article Click Here

Author(s): 
Sandy Hatten.
Journal: 
Contract Pharma,April ,May , 2000.
Syndicate content