Plant Tissue Culture : An Overview
Shrivastava S.
Plant tissue culture, the growth of plant cells outside an intact plant, is a technique essential in many areas of the plant sciences. It relies on maintaining plant cells in aseptic conditions on a suitable nutrient medium. The culture can be sustained as a mass of undifferentiated cells for an extended period of time or regenerated into whole plants.
Because plant cell culture is not affected by changes in environmental conditions, improved production may be available in any place or season. Therefore, studies on the production of useful metabolite by plant cell culture have been carried out on an increasing scale since the end of the 1950's. Their results stimulated more recent studies on the industrial application of this technology in many countries. However, there are still a few barriers that must be overcome before commercialization of many other products can occur. To overcome barriers hindering industrial application of plant cell cultures, however, it is required to conduct more fundamental research, including elucidation of biosynthetic pathways of many useful secondary metabolites in plants and mechanisms for their biosynthesis, collaboration with a number of researchers in other scientific fields is also very helpful. In this review, the background of research on plant cell culture, various approaches to improve the productivity of secondary metabolites and different techniques are discussed.
Introduction
From centuries, mankind is totally dependent on plants as a source of carbohydrates, proteins and fats for their food & shelter. In addition, plants are valuable source of a wide range of secondary metabolites, which are used as pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, flavors, fragrances, colors, biopesticides and food additives. Over 80% of the approximately 30,000 known natural products are of plant origin 1,2 . In 1985, 3500 new chemical structures have been identified and 2600 derived from the higher plants. Worldwide, 121 clinically useful prescription drugs are derived from plants 3 . Even today, 75% of the world’s population relies on plants for traditional medicine. In the US , where chemical synthesis dominates the pharmaceutical industry, 25% of the pharmaceuticals are based on plant-derived chemicals 4,5 .
Plants will continue to provide novel products as well as chemical models for new drugs in the coming centuries 6 . The advent of chemical analysis and the characterization of molecular structures have helped in precisely identifying these plants and correlating them with their activity under controlled experimentation. Despite advancements in synthetic chemistry, there is need of biological sources for a number of secondary metabolites including pharmaceuticals 7 . Elaborative pathways from basic primary metabolites, which are synthesized immediately as a result of photosynthetic activity, produce secondary metabolites. Other techniques like hairy root culture, biotransformation, immobilization and elicitations are used for the increased production of secondary metabolites. Through plant tissue culture the totipotent characteristics of plant can be used for the in vitro regeneration of plant.
Tissue culture is an experimental technique through which mass of cell is produced from the explants tissue. The callus produced can be utilized directly to regenerate plantlets or to extract or to manipulate some primary and secondary metabolites. Callus culture and suspension culture are the basic technique used to produce the desired metabolites of plants 8 . The plant and tissue cultures have been enabled to increase the knowledge in many areas including differentiation, cell division, cell nutrition and cell preservation. But now cells are cultivated in-vitro in bulk or as clone from single cells to grow whole plants from isolated meristem, then induce callus and develop complete plantlets by organogenesis or by embryogenesis. The research needs are based on the elements of scientific progress and development of new techniques, which either enables more critical experiment to be undertaken, or rendering easy accessibility to complicated problems through experimental studies 9,10 .
1. Need for a biotechnological approach
Biotechnology offers an opportunity to exploit the cell, tissue, organ or entire organism by growing them in-vitro and to genetically manipulate them to get desired compounds. Since the world population is increasing rapidly, there is extreme pressure on the available cultivable land to produce food and fulfill the needs. Therefore, for other uses such as production of pharmaceuticals and chemicals from plants, the available land should be used effectively. The development of micropropagation methods for a number of medicinal plant species has been already reported and needs to be adopted 11 .
Chemical engineers are currently developing improved and appropriate bioreactors for the improvement of production systems by adopting techniques of growth and metabolite production coupled with downstream processing of the products. The improvements in molecular biological research have given a new dimension to in-vitro culture as well as for plant improvement, enhancing the yields of the product and resulting in multiple products or producing novel products from genetically engineered plants. Moreover, the need for safer drugs without side effects has led to the use of natural ingredients with proven safety. These factors have laid emphasis on the use of biotechnological methods to enhance the production of pharmaceuticals and food additives in quality and quantity.
2. History in plant tissue culture
Haberlandt (1902) first envisioned the concept of plant tissue culture when he cultivated cells of various species on a medium containing glucose and peptone. Although he did not observe cell division, he described an approach whereby cellular physiology could be followed without the complexity of the whole level intervening. Haberlandt's pioneering research provided the groundwork for the first instances of callus induction and sustainable cell growth nearly forty years after his original experiments. Three independent and nearly simultaneous reports described callus initiation from carrots 12 and tobacco 13 in-vitro cultures.
Callus induction from other dicotyledonous species soon followed (Gautheret, 1983) and callus from the first monocot was reported by LaRue (1947) in Zea mays endosperm cultures. One of the reasons for their success in initiating and maintaining these cultures was the use of the plant growth regulators. The discovery of indole acetic acid (IAA) by Went (1926) provided a means to initiate callus from nontumorous tissues. Furthermore, the positive influence of coconut milk on cell proliferation was attributed to new class of growth regulator, cytokinins 14 (i.e. kinetin as described by Miller et al., 1955). The combined use of IAA and kinetin by Skoog and Miller 15 (1958) illustrated the synergism association with these compounds regarding the development of synchronized shoot-root plant regeneration. It should be pointed out the phrase 'plant tissue culture' is a really a misnomer in that the only tissue of plant origin that can be cultured is wound callus. In other instance of in-vitro culture where differentiation has occurred into shoots or roots, mixed tissues are involved in the final organs produced.
In a historical perspective, Cocking (1983) described problems and frustrations associated for the initial attempt to isolate and culture protoplasts. However, there have been several advances in this technology since the early 1970s. This includes the first reports of regeneration from protoplasts of Nicotiana tobaccum . The work of Sjepared and Totten (1977) with Solanum tuberosum was also a milestone since it represented the first case of protoplast-derived plant regeneration from a major agronomic crop. Advances are occurring in several monocotyledonous species such as Dactylis glomerata , Oryza sativa , Saccharum species, Triticum aestivum and Zea mays , where plant regeneration is now possible. A survey of historical milestone in plant tissue culture is shown in Table 1.
3. Strategies to increase secondary metabolite production
During the past decade, a considerable progress has been made to stimulate formation and accumulation of secondary metabolites using plant cell cultures 16 . The adopted strategies for enhancing the secondary metabolites are obtaining efficient cell lines for growth, screening of high-growth cell line to produce metabolites of interest, immobilization of cells to enhance yields of extra-cellular metabolites and to facilitate biotransformation, use of elicitors to enhance productivity in a short period of time, permeation of metabolites to facilitate downstream processing, adsorption of the metabolites to partition the products from the medium and to overcome feedback inhibition and scale-up of cell cultures in suitable bioreactors.
4. Types of nutrient media
The number of nutrient media is uses from time to time, their names and composition are given below in Table 2.
5. Plant cell cultures
Plant tissue culture provides an alternative way for the production of phytochemicals of therapeutic importance. Callus culture and suspension culture are the basic techniques used to produce the desired metabolites. Now a day techniques like hairy root culture, immobilization and elicitation are used to enhance the production of secondary metabolites. The plant tissue culture have some salient feature which includes, the clone generated through tissue culture which are identical in size, development stage and rate of metabolic activities and are capable of performing the transformative activity which involves biotransformation to produce primary and secondary metabolites in culture medium. Through plant tissue culture, the totipotent characteristic of plant cell lend them amenable to in-vitro regeneration into whole plant via embryogenesis, organogenesis or through micropropagation. Growing research in tissue culture technology provides the opportunities of biosynthesis of a variety of natural products using tissue culture. Different techniques of plant tissue culture are given below;
5.1. Organ cultures as a source of pharmaceuticals
Since production of secondary metabolites is generally higher in differentiated tissues, there are attempts to cultivate shoot cultures and root cultures for the production of medicinally important compounds, these organ cultures are relatively more stable 17 . There are a number of medicinal plants whose shoot cultures have been studied for metabolites (Table 3). Similarly, root cultures are valuable sources of medicinal compounds, root systems of higher plants generally exhibit slower growth and are difficult to harvest.
5.2. Hairy root cultures for pharmaceuticals
The ability of Agrobacterium rhizogenes to induce hairy roots in a range of host plants has lead to studies on it as a source of root-derived pharmaceuticals 18 . Tepfer 19 (1990) summarized 116 plants belonging to 30 dicotyledonous families wherein hairy roots have been induced. Hairy roots are induced by transfer of T-DNA from the plasmid of A. rhizogenes 20 to host tissue, resulting in root formation. A number of examples are given in Table 4.
5.3. Immobilization of plant cells for the production of secondary metabolites
Improvement in the secondary metabolite production of cell cultures is often associated with the organization and differentiation of plant cells. The concept of organization and differentiation led to the use of immobilization technology, which has long been used for microbes and enzymes. Immobilization is defined as a technique, which confines a catalytically active enzyme or cells on a fixed support and prevents its entry into liquid phase 21 . Immobilized plant cells have been used for single and multistep biotransformation of precursors to desired products as well as for the de-novo biosynthesis of secondary metabolites. Immobilization can have a dramatic impact on cellular physiology and secondary product formation. The more dramatic responses are summarized in Table 5.
5.4. Plant tissue culture by Micropropagation
Micropropagation is a combination of the arts and sciences of plant multiplication in-vitro and plant acclimatization. It is the true-to-type propagation of a genotype that comprises many steps-stock plant care, explants selection and sterilization, media manipulation to obtain proliferation, rooting, acclimation, and growing on of liners and is usually associated with commercial production. The purpose of micropropagation is to produce carbon copies of original unique plants or more simply put to grow clones in quantity. The micropropagation process is the culmination of all the inventions, theories, and discoveries man has made regarding the anatomy and physiology of the living world. When the long histories of other approaches to deliberate plant propagation, it is shortest but it is the most promising technique, today about 150 plants are commercially micropropagated. Many of these have reached the limits of their improvement by traditional methods. The emphasis on sustainable agriculture, increasing world population and the loss of prime land to housing and industry make this method of propagation indispensable. The history of micropropagation is shown in Table 6.
5.5. Plant tissue culture by Biotransformation
Biotransformations are chemical reactions catalyzed by cells, organs or enzymes. Biotransformations explore the unique properties of biocatalysts, namely their stereo-and regiospecificity and their ability to carry out reactions at no extreme pH values and temperatures. The biotransformation is another technique of tissue culture in which chemical conversion of an exogenously supplied substance can be done by the living cell culture. It is for commercial exploitation of secondary metabolites. Biotransformation is defined as chemical transformations that are catalyzed by microorganism or their enzymes 8 . The unlimited enzymatic potential of plant cell culture can in principle is used for bioconversion purpose. Biotransformation is an area of biotechnology that has achieved a considerable attention. It is the process in which pharmaceutically less important precursor is converted into the compound of interest. Biotransformation of digitoxin to gitoxin purpurea glycoside-A & purpurea glycoside-B from suspension culture of D. Purpurea 22 . Such modification can takes place at several positions in the molecules. Rakson & Baker 23 (1988) excellently summarized the advantages & disadvantages of biocatalyst. Cell suspension cultures, immobilized cells, enzyme preparations and hairy root cultures can be applied for the production of food additives or pharmaceuticals by biotransformation process (Table 7).
Summary and Conclusion
Since last two decades there have been considerable efforts was made in the use of plant cell cultures in bioproduction, bioconversion or biotransformation and biosynthetic studies. The potential commercial production of pharmaceuticals by cell culture techniques depends upon detailed investigations into the biosynthetic sequence. The great enthusiasms of biotechnologists have been seen in the potential use of cell culture in the production of valuable secondary products. Plant tissue culture is a noble approach to obtain their substances in large scale. Many companies in India and abroad are showing interest in this direction. Tissue culture is an alternative way for the production of phytochemical of therapeutic importance. Other techniques like hairy root culture, biotransformation, immobilization and elicitations are used for the increased production of secondary metabolites. By this approach an increase production of secondary metabolites are obtained. In present scenario it is an effective and efficient procedure for converting less medicinally important plant metabolites to a valuable product.
References
1. Phillipson, J.D., (1990), Plants as source of valuable products. In: Charlwood, B.V., Rhodes, M.J.C., editors. Secondary products from plant tissue culture. Oxford : Clarendon Press, 1–21.
2. Balandrin, M.J., Klocke, J.A., (1988), Medicinal, aromatic and industrial materials from plants. In: Bajaj YPJ, editor. Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry. Medicinal and aromatic plant , 4, 1–36.
3. Payne, G.F., Bringi, V., Prince, C., Shuler, M.L., (1991), Plant cell and tissue culture in liquid systems. Munich : Hanser Publ ., 1–10.
4. Glaser, V., 1999, Billion-dollar market blossoms as botanicals take root, Nat Biotechnol , 17, 17–8.
5. Farnsworth, N.R., 1985, The role of medicinal plants in drug development . In: Kroogsgard-Larsen P, Brogger Christenses S, editors, Natural products and drug development , Denmark: Munsgaard Copenhagen, 17–30.
6. Cox, P.A., Balick, M.J., 1994, The ethanobotanical approach to drug discovery, Sci Am , 82–7.
7. Pezzuto, J.M., 1995, Natural product cancer chemoprotective agents . In: Arnason JT, Mata R, Romeo JT, and editors. Recent advances in phytochemistry, Phytochemistry of medicinal plants , 29, 19–45.
8. Vyas, S.P., Dixit VK, (1999), Pharmaceutical biotechnology , 298, 299.
9. Mantell, S.H. and Smith, H., (1983), Plant Biotechnology , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge , 3.
10. Evans, D.A., Sharp, W.R., Ammirato, P.V. and Yamada, Y., (1983), Handbook of plant cell culture ”, Macmillan Publishing Co., New York , 1, 4.
11. Naik, G.R., (1998), Micropropagation studies in medicinal and aromatic plants. In: Khan IA , Khanun A, editors, Role of biotechnology in medicinal and aromatic plants. Hyderabad : Ukaz Publications , 50–6.
12. Gautheret, R. J., (1939), C.R. Hebd. Seances Acad. Sc ., 208, 118-120.
13. White, N.J., (1939), Am. J. Bot ., 26, 59-64.
14. Miller, C.O., Skoog, F., Von Saltza, M.H. and Strong, F.M., (1955), J . Am. Chem. Soc., 77, 1392.
15. Skoog, F. and Miller, C.O., (1958), Symp. Soc.m Exptl., 11:118-130
16. Ravishankar, G.A., Rao, R.S., (2000), Biotechnological production of phyto-pharmaceuticals, J Biochem, Mol Biol Biophys , 4, 73 –102.
17. Roja, G, (1994), Biotechnology of indigenous medicinal plants. PhD Thesis, Bombay University , Bombay .
18. Flores , H.E., Vivanco, J.M., Loyola-Vorgas, M., (1999), Trends Plant Sci., 4, 220–6.
19. Tepfer, D., (1990), Physiol. Plant , 79, 14–6.
20. Ambros, P.F., Matzke, A.J.M. and Matzyke, M.A., (1986), Embo J ., 5, 2073–7.
21. Lindsey, K., Yeoman, M.M., (1983), Novel experimental systems for studying the production of secondary metabolites by plant tissue cultures. In: Mantell SH, Smith H, editors. Plant biotechnology . London : Cambridge Univ. Press, 39–66.
22. Karow, E.O. and Passives, (1956), P.M ., Ind. Eng. Chem , 48, 2213.
23. Rakson, I.G. and Baker, P., (1988), Spec. Chem. , 239-240.
24. Purohit, S.S. and Mathur, S.K., (1990), Fundamentals of Biotechnology , A.B.P. Publication, 123-142.
Table 1: A survey of historical milestones in plant cell and tissue culture techniques24
|
Year |
Authors |
Results |
Species |
|
1892 |
Klercker |
First attempts to isolate protoplasts mechanically. |
- |
|
1902 |
Haberlandt |
First cultivation experiments with isolated plant cells; cell growth, but no cell division obtained. |
Tradescantia |
|
1904 |
Hanning |
Establishment of embryo culture for the first time |
Cochleria raphanus |
|
1909 |
Kuster |
First observation of fusing cells |
- |
|
1922 |
Kotte, Robins |
In vitro cultivation of root tips, no permanent cultures obtained |
Zea, Pisum |
|
1924 1925 |
Dieterich Laibach |
Embryo rescue- "artificial premature birth" |
Linum |
|
1934 |
Gautheret Nobecourt |
First permanent callus culture using B-vitamins and auxins |
Daucus, Nicotiana glauca x N. longsdorffii |
|
1942 |
Gautheret |
Observation of secondary metabolites in plant callus culture |
- |
|
1946 1952 |
Ball Morel et al. |
Micropropagation: first development of stem tips and sub adjacent regions: |
Tropaeolum Lupinus
|
|
1934 |
Gautheret Nobecourt |
First permanent callus culture using B-vitamins and auxins |
Daucus, Nicotiana glauca x N. longsdorffii |
|
1942 |
Gautheret |
Observation of secondary metabolites in plant callus culture |
- |
|
1946 1952 |
Ball Morel and Martin |
Micropropagation: first development of Stem tips and sub adjacent regions: plants free of viruses. |
Tropaeolum , Lupinus Dahlia |
|
1954 |
Morel et al. |
First suspension cultures of single cells or cell aggregates. Nurse culture |
Tagetes, Nicotiana, Daucus, Picea, Phaseolus |
|
1955 |
Mothes and Kala |
First reports of secondary metabolite production in liquid media |
- |
|
1956 |
Routien and Nickell |
US patent No.2747334 for the production of substances from plant tissue culture. |
Phaseolus |
|
1958 |
Wickson and Thimann Reinert, Steward et al. |
Establishment of axillary’s branching Somatic embryogenesis in tissue cultures |
Daucus |
|
1959 |
Tukecke and Nickell |
First report of large-scale (1341) culture of plant cells: carboy system |
Ginkgo,Lolium, Rosa,llex |
|
1960 |
Bergmann |
Cell clones obtained from single cultured cells plated in an agar medium |
Nicotiana, Phaseolus |
|
1960 |
Jones et al. |
Hanging drop culture in conditioned medium |
Nicotiana |
|
1960 |
Cocking |
Method for obtaining large number of protoplasts from plant tissue |
Lycopersicon |
|
1965 |
Morel |
Clonal multiplication of horticultural plant (orchid) through tissue droplet |
Cymbidium |
|
1965 |
Vasil and Hildebrandt |
Regeneration of a plant from one single cell cultivated in a hanging droplet |
Nicotiana |
|
1966 |
Kohlenbach |
First cell division and culture of differentiated mesophyll cells. |
Macleaya |
|
1967 |
Kaul and stabe |
Reports of the yields of certain of differentiated mesophyll cells. |
Ammi |
|
1967 |
Bourgin and Nisoh Guha and Maheshwari |
In vitro production of haploid plant from immature pollen with cultured anthers. |
Nicotiana Datura |
|
1970 |
Carlson |
Isolation of auxotrophic mutants from cultured cells |
Nicotiana
|
|
1977 |
Noguchi et al. |
Cultivation of tobacco cells in 200001reactors |
Nicotiana |
|
1978 |
Zenk |
Manifold increase in product yields by selection over parent plant documented for a variety of plant metabolites |
- |
|
1979 |
Brodelius et al. |
Alginate beads used to immobilize plant cells for biotransformation and secondary metabolite production |
- |
|
1981 |
Shuler |
Use of hollow reactor for secondary metabolite production |
- |
|
1983 |
Mitsui petrochemi. |
First industrial production of secondary plant products by suspension cultures |
Lithospermum |
|
1983 |
Barton Brill |
Insertion of foreign genes attached to a plasmid |
- |
|
1983 |
Chilton |
Production of transformed tobacco plants following single cell transformation |
Tobacco |
|
1985 |
Kohntoco |
Somatic hybrids in tobacco mediated by electro fusion |
Tobacco |
|
1986 |
Sundberg glemelius |
Somatic hybrids in Brassicaceae |
Plant species of Brassicaceae. |
Table 2: Media for Plant Tissue and Cell Cultures (mg/L)
|
Components |
Murashige- |
White |
Gamborg |
Nitsch |
Heller |
Schenk - |
Nitsch - |
Kohlenbach - |
Knop |
|
(NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 |
- |
- |
134 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
MgSO 4× 7H 2 O |
370 |
720 |
500 |
250 |
250 |
400 |
125 |
185 |
250 |
|
Na 2 SO 4 |
- |
200 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
KC1 |
- |
65 |
- |
1,500 |
750 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
CaC1 2× 2H 2 O |
440 |
- |
150 |
25 |
75 |
200 |
- |
166 |
- |
|
NaNO 3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
600 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
KNO 3 |
1,900 |
80 |
3,000 |
2,000 |
- |
2,500 |
125 |
950 |
250 |
|
Ca(NO 3 ) 2× 4H 2 O |
- |
300 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
500 |
- |
1,000 |
|
NH 4 NO 3 |
1,650 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
720 |
- |
|
NaH 2 PO 4× H 2 O |
- |
16.5 |
150 |
250 |
125 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
NH 4 H 2 PO 4 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
300 |
- |
- |
- |
|
KH 2 PO 4 |
170 |
- |
- |
- |
_ |
- |
125 |
68 |
250 |
|
FeSO 4× 7H 2 ) |
27.8 |
- |
27.8 |
- |
- |
15 |
27.85 |
27.85 |
- |
|
Na 2 EDTA |
37.3 |
- |
37.3 |
- |
- |
20 |
37.25 |
37.25 |
- |
|
MnSO 4× 4H 2 O |
22.3 |
7 |
10 (1 H 2 O) |
3 |
0.1 |
10 |
25 |
25 |
- |
|
ZnSO 4× 7H 2 O |
8.6 |
3 |
2 |
0.5 |
1 |
0.1 |
10 |
10 |
- |
|
CuSO 4× 5H 2 O |
0.025 |
- |
0.025 |
0.025 |
0.03 |
0.2 |
0.025 |
0.025 |
- |
|
H 2 SO 4 |
- |
- |
- |
0.5 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Fe 2 (SO 4 ) 3 |
- |
2.5 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
NiC1 2× 6H 2 O |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.03 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
CoC1 2× 6H 2 O |
0.025 |
- |
0.025 |
- |
- |
0.1 |
0.025 |
- |
- |
|
A1C1 3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.03 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
FeC1 3× 6H 2 O |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
FeC 6 O 5 H 7× 5H 2 O |
- |
- |
- |
10 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
K1 |
0.83 |
0.75 |
0.75 |
0.5 |
0.01 |
1.0 |
- |
- |
- |
|
H 3 BO 3 |
6.2 |
1.5 |
3 |
0.5 |
1 |
5 |
10 |
10 |
- |
|
Na 2 M 0 O 4× 2H 2 O |
0.25 |
- |
0.25 |
0.25 |
- |
0.1 |
0.25 |
0.25 |
- |
|
Sucrose |
30,000 |
20,000 |
20,000 |
50,000 |
20,000 |
30,000 |
20,000~30,000 |
10,000 |
- |
|
Myo-Inositol |
100 |
- |
100 |
- |
- |
1,000 |
100 |
100 |
- |
|
Nicotinic Acid |
0.5 |
0.5 |
1.0 |
- |
- |
0.5 |
5 |
5 |
- |
|
Pyridoxine HC1 |
0.5 |
0.1 |
1.0 |
- |
- |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
- |
|
Thiamine HC1 |
0.1-1 |
0.1 |
10 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
- |
|
Ca-Pantothenate |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Biotin |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.05 |
0.05 |
- |
|
Glycine |
2 |
3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2 |
2 |
- |
|
Cysteine HC1 |
- |
1 |
- |
10 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Folic Acid |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.5 |
0.5 |
- |
|
Glutamine |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
14.7 |
- |
Table 3: Shoot cultures of medicinal plants
|
Plant species |
Product |
Reference |
|
Artemi . Annua |
Artemesinin |
Park et al. (1989) |
|
Atro . Belladonna |
Atropine |
Benjamin et al. (1987) |
|
Begonia spp. |
– |
Takayama&Misawa(1981) |
|
Cath . Roseus |
Vindoline |
Staba and Chung (1981) |
|
Cinchona spp. |
Vinblastine |
Krueger et al. (1982) |
|
Di . purpurea |
Cardenolides |
Hagimori et al . (1982a b) |
|
Pelargonium tomentosum |
Essential oils |
Charlwood (1988) |
|
Withania somniferum |
Withanolides |
Heble (1985) |
Table 4: Hairy root cultures producing pharmaceutical products of interest
|
Plant species |
Product |
Reference |
|
Bidens spp. |
Polyacetylenes |
McKinely et al. (1993) |
|
Datura spp. |
Tropane |
Rhodes (1989) |
|
Cassia spp. |
Anthroquinones |
Ko et al. (1988) |
|
Glycyrrhiza uralensis |
Glycyrrhizin |
Ko et al. (1989) |
|
Panax ginseng |
Saponin |
Yoshikawa and Furuya (1987) |
Table 5: Dramatic effects of immobilization on secondary metabolite
production in plant cell cultures
|
Plant species |
Product |
Fold change |
Immobilizat -ion |
Reference |
|
C. frutescens |
Capsaicin |
> 100 (I) |
Foam |
Lindsey and Yeoman (1984) |
|
Coffea arabica |
Methylxanthin |
13 (I) |
Gel |
Haldimann and Brodelius (1987) |
|
Cath. Roseus |
Total alkaloids |
No de novo synthesis |
Membrane |
Payne et al. (1988) |
|
Muc. Prurins |
L-DOPA |
No de novo synthesis |
Gel |
Wichers et al. (1983) |
(I): increase, Adapted from Payne et al . (1991).
Table 6: History of Micropropagation
|
Year |
Invention |
Reseachers |
|
1590 |
Microscope |
Zacharias Jansen eyeglass maker in Holland |
|
1674 |
Improved microscope |
Antonii van Leeuwenhoekn "Father of Microbiology" |
|
- |
Compound microscope first to apply term cells |
Robert Hooke |
|
18th century |
Observations of callus formation in wounded trees |
Duhamel du Monceau |
|
1830's |
Beginning of theory of totipotency and Cell Theory |
Matthias Jacob Schleiden, botanist and Theodor Schwann, zoologist |
|
over 130 yrs. Ago |
First attempts to keep isolated organs alive |
|
|
1840's |
Theory that minerals in soil were important to plant growth. |
Justus von Liebig |
|
1858 |
Cells arise from prexisting cells |
Rudolf Virchnow |
|
1864 |
Pasteurization |
Louis Pasteur |
|
1865 |
Nutrient solution based on soil analysis |
Johann Knop |
|
1880 |
Presence of hormones first deduced |
Charles and Francis Darwin |
|
1883 |
Condenser lens for microscope |
Ernst Abbe |
|
Latter part of 19th |
Theory that germs cause disease, first to use disinfectants Sterile Technique |
Robert Koch |
|
1902 |
1st paper and experiments on the culture of isolated plant cells, prediction that plant embryos could be produced by vegetative cells |
Gottlieb Haberlandt |
|
1904 |
First successful culture of premature exised crucifer embyos |
E. Hannig |
|
1922 |
Asymbiotic germination |
Louis Knudson |
Table 7: Biotransformations using plant cell cultures for production of Pharmaceuticals
|
Plant species |
Substrate |
Product |
Reference |
|
P. somniferum |
Thebaine |
Codeine |
Wilhelm and Zenk (1997) |
|
Di . purpurea |
Digitoxin |
Digoxin |
Alfermann et al. (1980) |
|
Di . lanata |
Digitoxin |
Digoxin |
Alfermann et al. (1980) |
|
Podo . Hexandrum |
Coniferyl alcohol |
Podophyllotoxin |
Van Uden et al. (1995) |
|
Cath . roseus |
Vindoline |
Vincrisitne |
DiCosmo and Misawa (1995) |
About Authors
Shrivastava S.*, Dubey Darshan , Shweta K . and Dubey P.K
Smriti College Of Pharmaceutical Education, 4/1 Pipliya Kumar Kakad, Indore (M.P.) 452010 India ,
Ph. +91-731-2802262, e-mail- satyaendrascope@gmail.com, satyaendra_brncp@yahoo.co.in
