Rosuvastatin, a new HMG-CoA Reeductase Inhibitor with advantages over other available statins
The Food and Drug administration (FDA) approved a new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (rosuvastatin) on august, 2003. Rosuvastatin, is a synthetic, single enantiomer formulated and administered as the calcium salt. Although, dihydroxy heptenoic acid side chain is characteristic of the statin class, but one particular feature of the rosuvastatin molecule is a polar methane sulphonamide group that confers a relatively low lipophilicity, which make rosuvastatin relatively hydrophilic1,2 and hepatoselective1,2,3.
Mechanism of action: rosuvastatin is a reversible competitive inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase, which is the most important rate-limiting enzyme that converts 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A to mevalonate, a precursor for cholesterol1,4. In overall, few studies strongly suggest that rosuvastatin has the relatively greater binding to HMG-CoA reductase in comparison to other statins5,6. Rosuvastatin is relatively selective for liver and as a result of this action it increases the number of hepatic LDL receptors, which has been shown to increase ten time more by this drug in comparison to pravastatin2. This increase in LDL receptors enhances the uptake and catabolism of Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) and Very Low-Density Lipoprotein (VLDL). This ultimately results in reduced concentrations of VLDL and LDL in the circulation2,4,7. Additionally, significant increase in High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) is also observed with the use of rosuvastatin8. It is more potent than other statins such as atorvastatin, simvastatin and is 8-fold more potent than the hydrophilic comparator, pravastatin5,6.
Pharmacokinetic advantages: the absorption of rosuvastatin in man was moderately rapid with peak plasma levels (tmax) occurring within 3-5 hours of oral administration. 18-20 hours has been suggested to be the terminal (t½) of rosuvastatin which is relatively long compared with other statins9. Co-administration of rosuvastatin with food although reduce the rate but not the extent and LDL lowering effect of the drug10. One of the study showed that rosuvastatin is neither an inhibitor nor an inducer of cytochrome P450 isoenzymes11. Which suggest there may be low propensity for drug interactions mediated by cytochrome P45012,13. Moreover, rosuvastatin undergoes limited metabolism and approximately 90% of the drug is excreted unchanged in the faeces11.
Clinical supremacy over other statins: recent clinical studies suggest rosuvastatin to be more effective than existing statins8,14-19. Most recent clinical trials comparing the lipid modifying efficacy of statins showed greater efficacy of rosuvastatin in reducing LDL cholesterol compared with atorvastatin, simvastatin and pravastatin8. Also the greater LDL cholesterol reduction was achieved across the dose ranges (10-80mg) with rosuvastatin than with other statins. HDL Cholesterol was increased significantly better with rosuvastatin when it was compared across the doses ranges with statins in many recent studies8,18. Rosuvastatin also produce significantly better reduction in total cholesterol8,17 and similar or significantly better reductions of serum triglycerides8 levels and favorable lipid ratio18,19 in comparison to atorvastain, simvastatin and pravastatin. It is also suggested that the greater LDL cholesterol reduction with rosuvastatin then with the comparators resulted in higher percentage of patients who achieved National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) and European LDL Cholesterol goals8,17. Rosuvastatin is available in 5,10,20 & 40mg tablets but most importantly, rosuvastatin can achieve most of this lipid modifying benefits at a dose of 10mg/per day8. In one of the trial in special population groups i.e. age > 65, female sex, post-menopausal status, hypertension, atheroscelorsis, type-2 diabetes and obesity, suggested that rosuvastatin had consistent efficacy across these sub-groups16. Similarly one investigation suggested greater reduction of coronary artery disease risk because of the fact rosuvastatin achieves better lipid lowering goals in comparison to other statins17. In metabolic syndrome20 and in patients with typeIIa or IIb hypercholesterolemia18 their supremacy over other available statins also have been suggested.
Non-lipid (Pleitropic effects) of rosuvastatin: rosuvastatin has been shown to exert anti-inflammatory21 effects on the microvascular endothelial independent of its lipid lowering actions as well as to induce nitric oxide22 significantly from the vasculature and attenuate post ischemic myocardial injury following ischemia and reperfusion in mice. Thereby, indicating direct vascular and cardioprotective effects of rosuvastatin independent of its lipid lowering actions22.
Rosuvastatin is well tolerated with most commonly adverse effects being headache, dizziness, constipation, nausea, abdominal pain, myalgia and asthenia23. Active liver disease, severe renal impairment and myopathy are some of its contraindications24. Presently, rosuvastatin is indicated in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia (heterozygous familial and non-familial), mixed dyslipidemia (type-IIa and IIb) and with elevated serum TG levels (Fredricken type IV) patients.
In conclusion: rosuvastatin differ from other statins and offer many important advantages over the currently available statins in the form of low lipophilicity, high hepatocyte selectivity, minimal metabolism, low propensity for cytochrome P450 drug interactions and high potency. Moreover, rosuvastatin is significantly more effective at reducing LDL-cholesterol and get significantly more patient to their European and U.S NCEP ATP III, LDL-cholesterol goals. Additionally, non-lipid cardioprotective effects provided by rosuvastatin suggest that this newly introduced statin might become the drug of first choice for many patients with dyslipidemia in future.
{mospagebreak title=References}
REFERENCES:
1.Mc Taggart F, Buckett L, Davidson R, Holdgate G, McCormick A, Schneck D,
et al. Preclinical and clinical pharmacology of rosuvastatin, a new 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl
coenzyme A reducatase inhibitor. Am J Cardiol 2001; 87 (5A): 28B-32B.
2. Buckett L, Ballard P, Davidson R, Dunkley C, Martin L, Stafford J, et al.
Selectivity of ZD4522 for inhibition of cholesterol synthesis in hepatic versus
non-hepatic cells. Atherosclerosis Supplements 2000; 151: 41.
3. Brown CDA, Windass A, Bleasby A, Lauffart B. Rosuvastatin is a high affinity
substrate of hepatic organic anion transporter OATP-C. Atherosclerosis Supplements
2001; 2: 90.
4. Smith G, Davidson R, Bloor S, Burns K, Calnam CC, Aulay PMC, et al.
Pharmacological properties of ZD4522 – a new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor. Atherosclerosis
Supplements 2000; 151: 39).
5. Schuster H. Rosuvastatin-a highly effective new 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl
coenzyme A reductase inhibitor: review of clinical trial data at 10-40 mg doses
in dyslipidemic patients. Cardiology. 2003; 99(3): 126-39.
6. Istvan ES, Deisenhofer J. Structural Mechanism for statin inhibition of
HMG-CoA reductase. Science 2001; 292: 1160-1164.
7. Havekes L, van der Boom H, Emeis J, Princen H. New HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor
ZD4522 lowers plasma lipids and VLDL production in APOE*3 Leiden transgenic
mice. Atherosclerosis Supplements 2000; 151: 172.
8. Jones PH, Davidson MH, Stein EA, Bays HE, Mckenney JM, Miller E, et al.
Comparison of efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin. Simvastatin,
and provastatin across doses (STELLAR TRIAL). Am J Cardiol 2003; 92: 152-60.
9. Jones PH for STELLAR Study Group. Statin therapies for elevated lipid levels
compared across dose ranges to rosuvastatin: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol results. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003 (Suppl):
315A-316A, Abs 876-2.
10.Warwick MJ, Dane AL, Raza A, Schneck DW. Single-and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics
and safety of the new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor ZD4522. Atherosclerosis Supplements
2000; 151: 39.
11.Chapman MJ, Mc Taggart F. Optimizing the pharmacology of statins: characteristics
of rosuvastatin. Atherosclerosis Supplements 2002; 2: 33-36.
12.Cooper KJ, Marti PD, Dane AL, Warwick MJ, Schneck DW, Cantarini MV. Effect
of itraconazole on the pharmacokinetics of rosuvastatin. Clin Pharmacol Ther.
200; 73(4): 322-9.
13.Cooper KJ, Martin PD, Dane AL, Warwick MJ, Raza A, Schneck DW. Lack of effect
of ketoconazole on the pharacokinetics of rosuvastatin in healthy subjects.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003; 55(1): 94-9.
14.Berry DA, Berry SM, MeKellar J, Pearson TA. Comparison of the dose-response
relationships of 2 lipid-lowering agents: A Bayesian meta-analysis. Am Heart
J 2003; 145: 1036-45.
15.Schneck DW, Knopp RH, Ballantyne CM, McPherson R, Chitra RR, Simonson SG.
Comparative effects of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin across their dose ranges
in patients with hypercholesterolemia and without active arterial disease. Am
J Cardiol 2003; 91: 33-41.
16.Blasetto JW, Stein EA, Brown WV, Chitra R, Raza A. Efficacy of rosuvastatin
compared with other statins at selected starting doses in hypercholesterolemic
patients and in special population groups. Am J Cardiol 2003; 91 (suppl): 3C-10C.
17. Shepherd J, Hunninghake DB, Barter P, McKenney JM, Hutchinson HG. Guidelines
for lowering lipids to reduce coronary artery disease risk: A comparison of
rosuvastatin with atorvastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin for achieving lipid
lowering goals. Am J Cardiol 2003; 91 (suppl): 11C-19C.
18. Davidson M, Ma P, Stein EA, Gotto AM, Raza JA, Chitra R, et al. Comparison
of effects on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein
cholesterol with rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin in patients with type IIa
or Iib hypercholesterolemia. Am J Cardiol 2002; 89: 268-75.
19. Rader DJ, Davidson MH, Caplan RJ, Pears JS. Lipid and apolipoprotein ratios:
association with coronary artery disease and effects of rosuvastatin compared
with atorvastatin, pravastatin and simvastatin. Am J Cardiol 2003; 91(suppl):
20C-24C.
20.Ballantyne CM, Stein EA, Paoletti R, Southworth H, Blasetto JW. Efficacy
of rosuvastatin 10mg in patients with the metabolic syndrome. Am J Cardiol 2003;
91(suppl): 25C-28C.
21.Stalker T, Lefer A, Scalia R. A new HMG-Co A reductase inhibitor, rosuvastatin
exerts anti-inflammatory effects on the microvascular endothelium: the role
of mevalonic acid. BR J Pharmacol 2001; 133: 406-12.
22.Jones SP, Gibson MF, Rimmer III DM, Gibson TM, Sharp BR, Lefer DJ. Direct
vascular and cardioprotective effects of rosuvastatin, a new HMG-CoA reductase
inhibitor. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40: 1172-8.
23.Moghadasian MH, Mancini GBJ, Frohlich JJ. Pharmacotherapy of hyperchcholesterolaemia:
statins in clinical practice. Exp Opin Pharmacother 2000; 1: 683-95.
24.ABPI Compendium of data sheets and summary of product characteristics; CRESTOR,
March 2003.
About Authors
Dr Vishal R.Tandon has received his doctorate in Pharmacology
from Nagpur University, Maharashtra (India) in Dec, 2002.He has authored and/or
coauthored over 55 publications in many national and international journals. Two
chapters in different national books are also to his credit. His research interests
include herbal drug screening, especially working on plant Vitex negundo. He is
Expertise in designing and conducting clinical trials. He is currently working
as Senior Demonstrator Post graduate department of pharmacology and therapeutics,
GMC, Jammu (J&K)-India. His current job responsibilities include teaching
UG/PG classes as well as supervising research. He bears following post, a) Editorial
Secretary JK-SCIENCE, Journal of Medical
Education & Research . This Journal is indexed in Excerpta Medica/EMBASE,
Ulrich periodical Dictionary& Indian Science Abstract. b) Secretary-Indian
Rheumatology Association-J&K CHAPTER. c) Pear reviewer World Journal of Medical
Science. He is also life Member of Indian Pharmacological society, Association
of Physiologist and Pharmacologist of India, Indian Rheumatology Association and
Indian Menopause Society.
Co Author-
Dr. B. M. Gupta is working presently as (Lecturer)
Post Graduate Department of Pharmacology & Therapeutics
GMC, Jammu (J&K) India - 180001.
